查看: 45393|回复: 385
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Pentagon orders 30 universities to scrutinize ties with Chinese research partners, fueling new ‘Cold War’ in science_我的网站

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主

桃花期

Pentagon orders 30 universities to scrutinize ties with Chinese research partners, fueling new ‘Cold War’ in science_我的网站

前程无忧

A |     

The Pentagon, headquarters for the United States Department of War, is seen on August 13, 2026 in Arlington, Virginia. Photo: VCG
    The Pentagon, headquarters for the United States Department of War, is seen on August 13, 2026 in Arlington, Virginia. Photo: VCG
The US Department of War has ordered 30 US universities to review their research, financial and academic ties with foreign entities of concern, including Chinese institutions and organizations linked to former Confucius Institutes, warning that failure to comply could jeopardize their eligibility for future federal research funding.
This move marks the latest step in US' efforts to tighten academic cooperation with China, extending Cold War-style thinking into scientific research. Curtailing academic exchanges would ultimately undermine US' own research and innovation capacity, creating a self-imposed bottleneck for technological development, said a Chinese expert. 
In a statement on Monday, the department said that it had formally notified the universities to conduct "immediate and comprehensive" audits of their foreign collaborations as part of a broader effort to tighten research security and prevent what it described as "unauthorized technology transfers, intellectual property theft and adversarial exploitation." 
The reviews will cover active ties with foreign institutions identified under Section 1286 of the FY2019 National Defense Authorization Act, as well as organizations associated with rebranded Confucius Institutes. The institutions must report their findings and any actions taken to the department by August 31.
This move marks another step in Washington's push to tighten its "research security" agenda and shield US academia from perceived "foreign influence," as the federal government increasingly intervenes in universities' research partnerships, Zhu Ying, a professor at the Baize Institute at the Southwest University of Political Science and Law, told the Global Times on Tuesday.
By stretching the concept of national security, constraining academic freedom and politicizing scientific cooperation, Washington is turning research ties into a tool of strategic competition with China, said Zhu.
On July 23, the Department of War released its FY2025 update to the Section 1286 list, identifying 130 academic and research institutions in China, Russia and Iran that it claimed engaged in "problematic activities" and pose risks to US-funded research. The department urged US researchers, universities and industry partners to exercise strict caution when collaborating with, sharing data with or providing funding to institutions on the list.
Of the academic and research institutions on the list, more than 80 are based in China.
Zhu noted that the list continues to expand, covering more institutions and academic fields. The policies are putting growing pressure on US universities, threatening some joint projects and constraining decisions on research teams, funding and international exchanges. Moreover, these measures reflect a clear anti-China bias and risks creating discriminatory barriers. 
The Pentagon's statement on Monday claimed that to maintain eligibility for future federal research funding, the notified universities must complete a comprehensive audit of all identified foreign collaborations, assess the exposure of sensitive or export-controlled research, and implement strict mitigation plans, including the termination of problematic partnerships. 
The Pentagon did not release the names of the 30 universities. However, a Fox News report on Monday cited a US official as identifying the schools subject to the audit, including Georgetown University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of California, Berkeley, the University of California, San Diego, the University of Texas at Austin, Emory University and Harvard University, among others.
Weng Dongdong, who is a professor in virtual reality technology at Beijing Institute of Technology, an institution included on the 1286 List, noted that his university's collaborative ties with US partners have been terminated on multiple occasions, and such partnerships have become extremely scarce ever since the Department of War added it to the list. Cutting academic exchanges under the guise of national security has dealt a blow to normal academic interactions.
A Florida based university professor told the Global Times that as China and the US compete across multiple fronts, Washington, facing growing pressure as China catches up, is increasingly responding with restrictions and pushback.
But Chinese students and scholars are a vital part of US' scientific research workforce. Backed by strong foundational training, they have made significant contributions in STEM fields. If the US imposes stringent restrictions on recruiting Chinese students for China-US research partnerships, its own research capacity could suffer considerable damage, said the professor.
Zhu also noted that the US' continued tightening of reviews of university-level research cooperation in recent years stems from growing self-doubt and mounting anxiety as China's technological catch-up has outpaced US expectations. 
The latest move extends Cold War-era thinking into scientific research and has already had a chilling effect on academic exchanges. In the long run, tying cooperation with China to broadly defined "China-related risks" will undermine US' own research openness and innovation capacity, pushing the country toward a self-imposed technological bottleneck, said Zhu.
If the trend continues, a "new Cold War" in scientific research could emerge among China, the US and other major technological powers. Such fragmentation would squander global resources and impede scientific progress, said the expert. 
。    Sophie 编译 1月份新西兰的道路死亡人数创下2018年以来的最高记录,引发了要求获取驾照更严格的呼吁。

B |          交通部表示,上个月有36人死于交通事故,比起2023年1月的22人大幅增加,平均每天死亡一人以上。

C | 道路安全倡导者Greg Murphy表示,这一数据是“悲惨的”和“不可接受的”。         Advertise with us          他说,新西兰在这个问题上“完全关注了错误的地方”。         他今天早上在接受Breakfast采访时表示:“你想想所有受到(道路死亡事件)影响的人。”          “那些所有失去亲人的家庭和朋友们。这让人不寒而栗。”          “我对此并不感到惊讶,因为我们没有取得什么进展。我们没有做出必要的改变,我们的策略完全错误,至少在过去的10年里,我一直在重复说这句话。”          Murphy呼吁改变关注焦点,将重点放在对司机的教育上,而不是其他因素,如限速。         “我们没有改善核心问题,也就是司机。         “我们一直在以其他方式做同样的事情,我们正处于一个亡羊补牢的境地。

D | ”          他承认速度“绝对是每一起事故、撞车”中的一个因素。         但他说,全面降低限速并不是解决问题的办法,他呼吁对限速采取更有针对性的方法。         他把注意力分散和疲劳驾驶视为道路交通事故的两个最大因素。         “不幸的是,还有不胜任的问题。我们有太多不该开车的人在开车。

E | ”          “很多人根本就没有驾照,成千上万的人拿着错误的驾照开车,我们也没有让司机做好相应的准备。

F | 我们发放驾照的方式很草率。”          “这太荒谬了!我们在司机准备方面还差得远。”          “实际上,我们从一开始就为他们的失败做好了准备,因为我们现有的获取驾照的系统太糟糕了。

G | ”          这位赛车传奇人物严厉批评了“道路零死亡”倡议和新西兰交通局(NZTA),称NZTA“不知道他们在做什么”。         “对司机的关注几乎不存在,遗憾的是,不管喜欢与否,我们都需要沿着这条路走下去。”                    政客的看法          国家党的部长Chris Bishop和工党的议员Ginny Andersen随后出现在Breakfast节目中,加入了讨论。         Bishop说,毒品和酒精是造成道路死亡的“真正原因”。         “它们是最大的因素,是造成这种情况的主要原因。实际上,速度对整体道路死亡人数的影响较小。”          他补充说,政府还计划投资于安全的道路。         他承认,这是为了“找到适当的平衡”,一些地方(如校外)的限速可以降低,但他反对上届政府简单的“一棍子办法”。

H |          Andersen表示,速度是一个因素,并重申了Murphy关于注意力分散和疲劳驾驶的说法。         “我们需要做比现在更多的事情。”          “我们需要继续在教育司机方面做得更好,这必须从一开始就做。         “我认为我们需要在学校和年轻人中做得更好,让他们成为更好的司机。”          相关阅读:          24小时内5人死于道路交通事故,警方发出紧急安全警告          2023年新西兰进行了300多万次呼气测试,酒驾最严重的是……          过去一年里26.7万新西兰人发生过撞车事故,车险可能还要涨          注:本文为编译/原创,欢迎转发分享;但严禁复制等未经授权的非法使用。违反上述声明者,本网将追究其相关法律责任。使用授权请联系[email protected]。         chineseherald.co.nz All Rights Reserved 版权所有          (责编:Sophie)          相关内容                前绿党议员涉嫌偷走近10000纽币商品,最高可判7年监禁           奥克兰高温警报!全国部分地区迎来热浪           今晨北岛发生致命车祸,至少两人死亡           新西兰中小学迎来巨变!美情报官员在惠灵顿秘密开会……           强烈反对!奥克兰“壕区”居民叫板Watercare!           耸人听闻!6人在奥克兰著名海滩徒步时神秘失踪,更多女子像猎物一样被追逐恐吓           疫情通报:过去一周新西兰新增5757例           突发!James Shaw将辞去绿党联合党魁一职。

Current article:http://652.ketaishaozaersaixiongdian.bond/1l6ubk/20260826/4184.html

Published on:11:03:01


点击获取礼包
沙发
发表于 14:09:57 | 只看该作者
黑金 龙门镖局 文化大观园
板凳
发表于 10:28:00 | 只看该作者
猩球崛起 无证之罪 第五元素
地板
发表于 15:58:28 | 只看该作者
一代女皇 幻夜 绝命毒师第五季
5#
发表于 03:48:32 | 只看该作者
窈窕淑女 杀人回忆 律政英雄
6#
发表于 22:25:56 | 只看该作者
哔哩哔哩 一诺倾情 铁齿铜牙纪晓岚
7#
发表于 06:44:40 | 只看该作者
金刚狼 余罪 新白娘子传奇
8#
发表于 19:31:00 | 只看该作者
辛普森一家 七宗罪 出发吧爱情
9#
发表于 06:40:34 | 只看该作者
如果我爱你 阿甘正传 花木兰传奇
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

我的网站是互联网最大的搜索引擎优化研究中心,是致力于培养学员用户体验意识和提供专业技术解答的专业培训机构, 成立于2007年,2008年第一家入驻歪歪的培训机构,2014年成为腾讯课堂战略合作机构。
© 2007-2016 我的网站 湘ICP备13004652号-1 Powered by Discuz!X Template by 我的网站 
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表